Author: Grant Messick

Automating denials is a bit like mapping the stars.

The earliest Western catalog of the stars was created by the Greek astronomer Hipparchus, building on earlier work going back to the Babylonians. Automation for revenue cycle operations is still a relatively early and evolving field and solution developers face particular challenges when attempting to map the universe of denials in order to apply automation.

To many, automating denials may feel more like an aspirational concept than a reality. It may feel like an effort similar to mapping the stars—one that takes generations and some of mankind’s greatest thinkers. However, if accomplished, the benefits of an automated denials solution could be substantial: timely, accurate, and effective appeals; maximized overturn rate; lower cost to collect; and freedom for denials staff to work at the top of their license, focusing on the hardest and most complex denials.

The Challenge of Automating Denials

Denials is a particularly challenging area of revenue cycle operations to automate because it involves processes with seemingly infinite scenarios. Payers change their rules and their use of codes on a regular basis. Staff investigate each denial and then take one of several different approaches to fight, fix, and/or overturn the denial. Many denials require rigorous appeal processes and coordination across multiple departments. Some may question if automation in this space is even possible.

At AKASA, we’ve developed proprietary technology and approaches called Unified Automation™ that apply machine learning to address the dynamic nature of denials. We often get asked, “how is machine learning different from traditional automation solutions such as robotic process automation (RPA),”  In the case of denials, the difference is a game-changer.

Trying to build a rules-based engine to manage denials with RPA is like trying to map the stars. Between the complexity, the quantity, and the vast number of combinations, trying to tackle such a task in such a manual way may be impossible.  This level of complexity is a perfect opportunity to apply a machine learning process that can continuously watch and learn from human work to ‘train’ an algorithm to automate the responses to specific denial codes.

In the short term, the algorithm can select certain codes and build a high confidence level around the next steps required for a certain scenario. Over time, the algorithm will continuously evolve and add new codes and new scenarios to its repertoire – taking on more tasks and more complex functions as it learns. These machine-learning approaches have the ability to significantly accelerate our ability to automate denials. Just imagine what more Hipparchus may have achieved with the benefit of a modern telescope.

For example, a finite set of about 12 denial codes could be classified as eligibility denials, typically stemming from one of approximately 10 different eligibility issues upstream, and typically requiring one of approximately 6 different responses. The manual process of mapping the rules in order to develop RPA in this scenario likely isn’t worth the investment of time and manpower (12 x 10 x 6 = 720 rules). However, this is exactly the kind of problem best solved by machine learning. Certainly, some clinical denials will likely always require involvement from a medical professional who can justify the care that was delivered, but others may be addressed with machine-learning-based solutions like Unified Automation™.

The Promise of Unified Automation

Unified Automation may be the breath of fresh air that we’ve been looking for to effectively automate denials. Recent digital transformation efforts and other investment in denials management have yielded mixed and often underwhelming results. While denials still consistently rank among finance executives’ top priorities, organizations across the industry have struggled to achieve meaningful improvement.

To make a dent in denials, organizations must deploy a substantial combination of expertise, analytics, stakeholder coordination, technology, meetings, and leadership—all of which take additional time and investment. Many health systems are standing up dedicated denials teams and committees, as well. In spite of all of that, industry best practice overturn rates remain relatively stagnant around 60%, meaning we are still losing our appeals 40% of the time, and in some cases, denials quantities are so high that they cannot be worked before the denials age out and have to be written off as a complete loss.

Denials have, and will continue to be, a pervasive hurdle that revenue cycle departments must address. Fortunately, machine learning approaches are enabling the development of a new generation of automation solutions that can do the heavy lifting for us, minimizing the human touches required, maximizing overturn rates, and allowing denials professionals to get laser-focused on the small subset of work that truly requires human intervention. New approaches, such as Unified Automation, allow us to efficiently connect “the stars” in a multitude of constellations—effectively mapping the universe of denials for automation that truly delivers on the aspirations of digital transformation.

See for yourself how Unified Automation can make a difference in your revenue cycle and request a demo today.

Grant Messick, Head of Customer Success

Grant Messick, head of customer success at AKASA, has spent his career in revenue cycle and has worked with more than 60 health systems across the country. Prior to joining AKASA, he was principal at the Chartis Group, partner at the Advisory Board, and a revenue cycle executive at Cerner. With an economics degree from the University of Virginia, Messick started his career as a pediatric practice manager.

WRITTEN BY
Grant Messick

Grant Messick, vice president of customer success at AKASA, has spent his career in revenue cycle and has worked with more than 60 health systems across the country. Prior to joining AKASA, he was principal at the Chartis Group, partner at Advisory Board, and a revenue cycle executive at Cerner. With an economics degree from the University of Virginia, Messick started his career as a pediatric practice manager.

Form-Logo

Sign up for our Newsletter

You May Also Like

Blog Resource
Jan 11, 2022

Claims Automation AI: The Ticket to Cleaner Claims and a More Efficient Revenue Cycle

  Claims management has long been a concern for healthcare providers and revenue cycle teams. Denials, prior authorization requirements,...

Blog denial1
Dec 16, 2021

What Is Denial Management in Healthcare?

  Increased complexity, delayed reimbursement timelines, and more work for staff are all common outcomes of denied claims in...

Blog Resource
Nov 11, 2021

A Blueprint for Modernizing Your Denial Management Strategy

Denial management in the healthcare revenue cycle is an inherently complex task — one that, at first glance, might...

Blog Bad-Debt_09-2021_800x330_4.svg
Sep 1, 2021

How Automation Can Fix Hospital Bad Debt

Author: Grant Messick, director of customer success   With high health insurance premiums, deductibles, and cost of care, patients are...

Blog Akasa_PressRelease
Jul 29, 2021

Healthcare Claims Denials Are at an All-Time High: Here’s What You Can Do

Authors: Grant Messick, managing director of customer success, and Leland Robbins, director of technical program management Increasing healthcare claim denial rates...

Blog Alphie_Galaxy
Dec 22, 2020

How to Address the Challenges of Eligibility Denials

Real-time eligibility (RTE), patient eligibility verification that allows medical staff to electronically verify patients’ insurance coverage for medical treatment,...

Blog Alphie_Galaxy
Oct 20, 2020

Overcoming the Challenges Around Automating Denials

Author: Grant Messick Automating denials is a bit like mapping the stars. The earliest Western catalog of the stars...

Find out how AKASA's AI-driven automation can help you.